Ellen Smith for Oak Ridge City Council
My Views on some Issues
-
See blog for issues current in 2007
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lobbyist services and efforts
to obtain
additional
federal assistance
I have supported City efforts to obtain additional
federal
financial support to compensate for the "special burdens"
of being an atomic energy community. My involvement in local
environmental matters has made me very aware of the special burdens Oak
Ridge faces, including the negative effects of outsiders'
misconceptions about environmental conditions, the special costs of
providing public services in a city with a major federal presence, and
burdens related to future long-term stewardship for the environmental
legacy that will remain after DOE announces that it has finished
clean-up on the Oak Ridge Reservation.
I was initially encouraged about
the City's
current efforts to get the state to authorize
"tipping fees" on facilities used for disposal of mixed
radioactive and
hazardous wastes. Anderson County's
legislators, State Senator Randy McNally and Representative Jim
Hackworth, introduced bills in the Tennessee General Assembly that would allow municipalities and
counties to collect fees from generators that send waste to a mixed
waste disposal facility in their jurisdictions. The idea was that the
city and counties could collect fees from DOE for waste disposal in
DOE's Environmental Management Waste Facility in Bear Creek Valley.
Since the proposed law would not cost the state anything and
would only affect Oak Ridge, it probably could have sailed smoothly
through the legislature -- with or without the help of a paid lobbyist
-- if it had had the support of the Oak Ridge community before it was
introduced in Nashville. However, it was not a wise investment for the
City to hire a lobbyist to "sell" this plan to the state legislature
before it had been "sold" in Oak Ridge, and it died due to lack of
consensus here.
We should not hire paid lobbyists
except in unusual cases when we have a clear and specific goal for
legislative action and the bills will not pass without specialized
political help. We should not have needed special help to pass this
bill in
Nashville, if community support had developed before it was proposed in
Nashville.
Earlier, it was a good idea to hire a law firm to help with the funding
effort,
but the city did not get its money's worth for the $12,000 monthly fee
paid to the Baker Donelson firm. The contract should not have been
allowed to run for the full 3 years. The money that was being used to
pay for the law firm is not "burning a hole in the city's pocket,"
waiting to be spent. Rather than throwing it away on lobbyists, we
should use it for local needs.
Meanwhile, we should treat the DOE Oak Ridge Reservation land as a
valuable community asset in its present state. Its valuable functions
include conservation, recreational open space (that should be opened up
to more uses), a location for environmental research and possible
future federal missions (the SNS wouldn't be here without the land
resource), and a physical buffer that helps assure residents that we
are shielded from DOE's industrial activities.
More
commentary and online discussion of lobbying contracts.
More commentary and online discussion on DOE land
issues.
Redevelopment of Oak Ridge
Mall
I strongly
support the concept
of converting the Oak Ridge Mall into a "town center" -- a commercial development that recovers some of the
"feel" and function of a traditional downtown. This is a vitally
important initiative to assure Oak Ridge's future, so it is appropriate
for the City to assume a role in it. We need to recapture the mall area
as a retail center because residents need shopping, because Tennessee's
tax structure makes retail an important source of revenue for local
governments, and because the lack of a vibrant retail sector in Oak
Ridge is one of the factors that cause area newcomers to locate
somewhere else.
More commentary and online discussion of this issue.
Senior
citizens
programs
Each
year, plans for a new senior center
get delayed until farther in the future. Now that Oak Ridge High School
is the City’s number one capital priority, a new senior center
is even less likely to become a reality. Seniors who used the old
facility are understandably frustrated. The Emory Valley Center is an
inferior facility and lacks the central location of the old center.
Rather than griping about the situation with the senior center, it’s
time for Oak Ridge’s seniors and the City’s leadership to do some new
creative thinking about how to best serve our large senior population –
with or without a new building.
Relatively few seniors take advantage of the activities at the senior
center, largely because many important programs for seniors exist
independently of the senior center. The City senior program is serving
many seniors well when it connects them with the city transit and taxi
coupon program and with resources and opportunities at the public
library, Civic Center, Keystone Elder Day Center, Oak Ridge Institute
of Continued Learning, local churches, and institutions such as the
American Museum of Science and Energy, the Children’s Museum, the
hospital, and schools that always need volunteers.
The City should be looking to fill other unmet needs. I would like to
see improved transportation for elderly residents. City Council
should use its regulatory authority to ensure that the local taxi
company has safe and well-maintained vehicles. City leadership should
explore options for expanding transportation services to the evening
hours and should work with private business to develop a system of
occasional group transportation (for example, by van) to out-of-town
destinations of interest to many seniors, such as Knoxville arts
events, Knox County shopping centers, and the Smokies.
More commentary and online discussion of this issue.
Tax abatements for
commercial
development
City Council has authorized a package
of standard tax abatements as incentives for major new commercial
developments (including retail, apartments, and office projects) and
renovations. The Industrial Development Board may now grant multi-year
property tax reductions for the value added by certain projects with
new investments of over $1 million.
I like the idea of offering creative incentives for
certain
types of commercial development that address a particular civic need
(such as revitalizing retail in the city center mall area or restoring
an historic property such as the Alexander Inn) or where the developer
must overcome significant obstacles that increase the cost of the
project (for example, if the project includes renovating or demolishing
long-vacant buildings that contain asbestos). However, I am
uncomfortable with public subsidies for commercial projects unless
those projects address an identified civic need. The standard package
of subsidies now in place may encourage unnecessary development that
competes unfairly against existing businesses. Council should
modify this plan to require clearer linkage with identified city
objectives.
More commentary and online discussion of this issue.
Highland View
neighborhood
revitalization
I am glad
that the City is
trying to revitalize older neighborhoods -- for the well-being of the people who live there,
and to make these areas more attractive and desirable for a new
generation of residents. The Oak Ridge Housing Task Force, with the
city staff and City Council, deserves thanks for starting the process
in this center-city neighborhood. The neighborhood steering committee
worked hard to create a good process that the new Highland View
Redevelopment Advisory Board will oversee.
I support demolition of the Applewood Apartments, because they appear
to have become physically hazardous to tenants and because they are a
source of blight in the neighborhood. Some other structures in the area
may deserve a similar fate. In general,
however, I would prefer to support and enhance the existing
neighborhood instead of tearing it down. I
believe that the best long-term results for this and other older
neighborhoods will come from empowering and assisting homeowners and
other property owners, rather than imposing large-scale "urban renewal."
More commentary and online discussion of this issue.
Pension
equity for retired federal contractor employees
Retirees from the federal
contractors that operate the DOE facilities
in Oak Ridge are not getting a fair deal. The value of their
pensions
is steadily declining. The pension fund has a healthy
balance, but there is no provision for
adjusting pensions to accommodate increases in the cost of living.
Pensioners have seen their
purchasing power seriously decrease. Other AEC/DOE contractor pension
programs do not treat retirees so shabbily.
Not only is fairer
treatment for these Oak Ridge retirees -- most of them folks who
dedicated their working lives to helping the West win the Cold War --
the right thing to do, but it would
benefit everyone in our area by
injecting many additional dollars into the local economy.
The Coalition of Oak Ridge Retired
Employees has outlined a set of
requests to restore some of the lost buying power of current retirees
and assure the benefits of future retirees. Their requests are
reasonable ones (for example, they want pensioners to have 75% of the
purchasing power they retired with -- that's a modest request). It is gratifying that the City Council
decided to lend its
support to retirees' efforts to achieve more equitable pension
treatment.
|